Economics Is the 'Just Right' Liberal-Arts Major

Thanks to Mark Showalter for pointing out this essay in the Chronicle of Higher Education by David Colander.

http://www.viet-studies.info/kinhte/Economic_Major_CHE.pdf

Highlights:

To that end, I asked my students why they considered the other social sciences
easy. The answer was twofold. First, far fewer courses in those fields are taught quantitatively than is the case in economics, even though much of the relevant research work is highly quantitative. Other social-science curricula could challenge students more by adding some applied-statistics, math, or computer-science courses as standard requirements. The second reason my students considered the other majors too easy was that they believed the grading standards were undemanding. If they are right, those standards could be raised. For example, social-science courses could require students to write substantial papers that are subject to rigorous standards of logic and exposition.

When I asked my students how the natural sciences could become "just right" majors, they suggested that those departments focus less on training future scientists and more on educating future citizens about the exciting developments in science today. That way, science majors would be able to wait to become scientists in graduate school; they could learn about science during their undergraduate years. One way to accomplish this might be reducing both the number of required courses and the number that require labs. My students also suggested that natural-science introductory classes could be changed from "hurdles" — classes designed to scare away students who are not fully dedicated — to "gateways" that allow students to experience the wonder of science while welcoming them into the field.